🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."